Biography
高品質なNS0-093模擬練習一回合格-最新のNS0-093的中問題集
私たちが知っているように、一部の人々は以前に試験に失敗し、NS0-093トレーニング資料を購入する前にこの苦しい試験に自信を失いました。私たちはここで悲しみを分けます。これから時間のかかる思考を捨てることができます。対照的に、それらは不明瞭なコンテンツを感じることなくあなたの可能性を刺激します。 NS0-093試験準備を取得した後、試験期間中に大きなストレスにさらされることはありません。
Network Appliance NS0-093(NetApp Accredited Hardware Support Engineer)試験は、NetAppハードウェアシステムのトラブルシューティングとメンテナンスに精通しているプロフェッショナルをテストするために設計されています。信頼性の高いストレージソリューションの需要が高まる中、ネットワークエンジニアリングのプロフェッショナルは、その知識とスキルセットを証明することが求められています。NS0-093試験は、ハードウェアサポートエンジニアがNetAppハードウェアに関連する問題を効果的に診断および解決できることを確認します。
>> NS0-093模擬練習 <<
NS0-093的中問題集 & NS0-093模擬解説集
JPTestKingのNS0-093問題集を利用してみたらどうですか。この問題集はNS0-093試験に関連するすべての参考書の中で一番優秀なものだと言えます。なぜならば、次の四つの理由があります。第一に、JPTestKingのNS0-093問題集はIT領域の専門家達が長年の経験を活かして作成されたもので、試験の出題範囲を正確に絞ることができます。第二に、JPTestKingのNS0-093問題集は実際試験に出題される可能性がある問題を全部含んいます。第三に、JPTestKingのNS0-093問題集は試験の一発合格を保証し、もし受験生が試験に失敗すれば全額返金のことができます。第四に、JPTestKingのNS0-093問題集はPDF版とソフト版という二つのバージョンに分けています。この二つのバージョンを利用して、受験生の皆さんは試験の準備をするときにもっと楽になることができます。
NS0-093認定試験は、IT業界で経験があり、NetAppハードウェア製品を強く理解している専門家向けです。この試験では、NetAppハードウェア製品のインストール、構成、トラブルシューティング、メンテナンスなど、幅広いトピックをカバーしています。この試験は、NetAppハードウェア製品に関連する複雑な問題に対処する候補者の能力をテストするように設計されています。
Network Appliance NetApp Accredited Hardware Support Engineer 認定 NS0-093 試験問題 (Q41-Q46):
質問 # 41
A node has failed.
Which two conditions must be met for an automatic takeover to be triggered? (Choose two.)
- A. NVRAM must be synchronized.
- B. The combined utilization of both nodes must be less than 100%.
- C. Mailbox disks must be reachable.
- D. The cluster network must be available.
正解:A、C
解説:
For an automatic takeover to occur in an HA pair, the following conditions must be met:
* The HA pair uses mailbox disks to coordinate and ensure that both nodes have consistent cluster state information.
* If the mailbox disks are not reachable, the takeover process cannot proceed.
1. Mailbox Disks Must Be Reachable:
* The nodes in an HA pair continuously mirror NVRAM data to ensure that writes are protected.
* If NVRAM is not synchronized, the takeover cannot safely handle active workloads.
2. NVRAM Must Be Synchronized:
* A. The combined utilization of both nodes must be less than 100%:
* This is not a requirement for automatic takeover. ONTAP can handle higher utilization during failover scenarios.
* B. The cluster network must be available:
* While the cluster network is critical for normal operation, takeover can still occur if the cluster network is unavailable, as long as the HA interconnect is operational.
Why Other Options Are Incorrect:
* NetApp "ONTAP High Availability Guide" outlines the requirements for automatic takeover in HA pairs.
* "ONTAP NVRAM Synchronization and Failover Guide" explains NVRAM mirroring requirements.
References:
質問 # 42
A SAS connection is reporting a single PHY down.
What are the two most likely causes? (Choose two.)
- A. improperly seated cable
- B. defective cable
- C. outdated I/O module (IOM1 firmware
- D. an offline shelf in the stack
正解:A、B
解説:
Understanding a Single PHY Down Issue:
* In SAS environments, a PHY represents a physical layer connection between devices.
* When a single PHY reports a "down" status, it typically indicates an issue with the physical connectivity or the associated hardware.
Cause 1: Improperly Seated Cable
* If the SAS cable is not properly seated in the port, the connection for one or more PHYs may fail.
* Reseating the cable on both ends (controller and shelf) often resolves the issue.
Cause 2: Defective Cable
* A damaged or faulty SAS cable can cause PHY errors.
* Replacing the cable and verifying the connection resolves the issue in this case.
Why Other Options Are Not Likely:
* B. Outdated IOM firmware: While outdated firmware can cause other issues, it rarely affects only a single PHY.
* D. Offline shelf: If an entire shelf is offline, more than one PHY would typically be affected, as multiple connections are involved in SAS stacks.
NetApp Reference Documentation:
* Found in the "ONTAP SAS Cabling Guide" and "Shelf Troubleshooting Guide". These documents detail troubleshooting for PHY errors and common SAS hardware issues.
質問 # 43
Which two factors can increase the chances of experiencing a NetApp WAFL inconsistency on an aggregate?
(Choose two.)
- A. ignoring NetApp Active IQ health risks
- B. using outdated disk firmware
- C. constantly running at high load
- D. upgrading frequently
正解:A、B
解説:
* A. Ignoring NetApp Active IQ health risks
* Explanation:NetApp Active IQ provides proactive monitoring and alerts for system health risks, including risks related to WAFL inconsistencies. Ignoring these alerts can lead to unresolved issues such as metadata corruption, hardware failures, or system misconfigurations, increasing the chances of WAFL inconsistencies.
* Examples of Active IQ Risks:
* Disk health warnings.
* High write latency or metadata bottlenecks.
* Aggregates running out of space.
* C. Using outdated disk firmware
* Explanation:Outdated disk firmware can cause performance issues, drive failures, or incorrect handling of I/O operations, potentially leading to WAFL inconsistencies. Disk firmware updates often include fixes for critical issues that improve reliability and prevent data corruption.
* Importance:Keeping firmware updated ensures compatibility with ONTAP and minimizes risks of disk-level errors that can propagate to WAFL.
Why the Other Options Are Incorrect:
* B. Constantly running at high load:
* Running at high load can impact performance but does not directly cause WAFL inconsistencies.
WAFL is designed to handle high I/O loads efficiently.
* D. Upgrading frequently:
* Frequent upgrades, when performed correctly, do not increase the chances of WAFL inconsistencies. However, improperly executed upgrades or skipping recommended steps might introduce risks.
References:
* NetApp Knowledge Base: Articles on Active IQ health checks and disk firmware management.
* ONTAP System Administration Guide: Recommendations for preventing WAFL inconsistencies.
質問 # 44
Which RAID type provides protection against three disk failures?
- A. RAID 4
- B. RAID DP
- C. RAID 5
- D. RAID-TEC
正解:D
解説:
RAID-TEC Overview:
* RAID-TEC (Triple Erasure Coding) is a NetApp RAID technology designed to protect against up to three simultaneous disk failures.
* It is ideal for systems with high-density disks or workloads requiring extreme fault tolerance.
Why RAID-TEC Is Correct:
* RAID-TEC uses triple-parity protection, which provides redundancy against three disk failures, making it more resilient than RAID-DP or RAID 5.
* RAID-DP only protects against two disk failures, while RAID 4 and RAID 5 protect against a single failure.
NetApp Reference Documentation:
* "NetApp RAID and Data Protection Guide" details the differences between RAID-DP and RAID-TEC, highlighting RAID-TEC's ability to tolerate three failures.
質問 # 45
What is the recommended value for disk and CPU use when you plan an upgrade?
- A. less than 85%
- B. less than 90%
- C. less than 50%
- D. less than 70%
正解:D
解説:
Upgrade Considerations for Disk and CPU Utilization:
* During an ONTAP upgrade, it is critical to ensure the system has sufficient resources to handle the upgrade process without impacting normal operations.
Recommended Threshold:
* NetApp recommends that both disk and CPU utilization should be below 70% before initiating an upgrade. This ensures that there is enough headroom for the upgrade operations and avoids performance degradation.
Steps to Verify Utilization:
* Use the system node show -fields cpu command to check CPU usage.
* Use the storage aggregate show -fields used command to check aggregate disk utilization.
NetApp Reference Documentation:
* "ONTAP Upgrade and Maintenance Guide" specifies the 70% threshold for disk and CPU usage during upgrade planning.
* The "ONTAP Performance Management Guide" provides methods for monitoring system resource utilization.
質問 # 46
......
NS0-093的中問題集: https://www.jptestking.com/NS0-093-exam.html