CSP-Assessor Lernhilfe, CSP-Assessor Testing Engine
Machen Sie sich noch Sorge darum, dass Sie keine enchten und zuversichtlichen Schulungsunterlagen zur Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung finden können? Schulungsunterlagen zur Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung aus DeutschPrüfung sind von den erfahrenen IT-Experten zusammengechlossen, sie sind kombniert von Fragen und Antworten, daher sind sie nicht vergleichbar. Ihre Genauigkeit ist auch zweifellos. Wählen Sie DeutschPrüfung, dann wählen Sie Erfolg.
Machen Sie sich noch Sorgen um die Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifzierungsprüfung? Bemühen Sie sich noch anstrengend um die Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifzierungsprüfung? Wollen Sie so schnell wie mlglich die die Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen? Wählen Sie doch DeutschPrüfung! Mit ihm können Sie ganz schnell Ihren Traum verwirklichen.
CSP-Assessor Testing Engine - CSP-Assessor Demotesten
Swift CSP-Assessor Zertifizierungsprüfung ist heute sehr populär. Wollen Sie an der CSP-Assessor Prüfung teilnehmen? Tatsächlich ist diese Prüfung sehr schwierig. Aber es bedeutet nicht, diese Prüfung mit guter Note sehr leicht zu bestehen. So, wissen Sie den kürzesten Weg zum Erfolg? Das ist natürlich die CSP-Assessor Dumps von DeutschPrüfung.
Swift CSP-Assessor Prüfungsplan:
Thema
Einzelheiten
Thema 1
Thema 2
Thema 3
Swift Customer Security Programme Assessor Certification CSP-Assessor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q74-Q79):
74. Frage
What type of keys does the HSM box store? (Select the correct answer)
*Connectivity
*Generic
*Products Cloud
*Products OnPrem
*Security
Antwort: A
Begründung:
A Hardware Security Module (HSM) box in the SWIFT context is a secure device used to manage cryptographic keys and perform security operations, such as signing and encryption for SWIFT transactions.
Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Private keys
This is correct. The primary function of an HSM box in the SWIFT environment is to securely store and manage private keys, which are part of the Public Key Infrastructure (PKI) used for asymmetric cryptography.
Private keys are used for signing messages to ensure authenticity and integrity, and for decryption to maintain confidentiality. The HSM protects these private keys from unauthorized access, aligning with CSCF Control
"1.3 Cryptographic Failover," which mandates the use of HSMs to safeguard cryptographic materials. SWIFT documentation specifies that private keys are stored within the HSM, while public keys are distributed separately (e.g., via certificates).
*Option B: Public keys
This is incorrect. Public keys are not stored in the HSM box. Instead, they are embedded in PKI certificates and distributed to other parties (e.g., SWIFT or counterparties) for verification and encryption purposes. The HSM's role is to protect the sensitive private keys, not to store public keys, which are openly shared as part of the PKI ecosystem.
*Option C: Both private and public keys
This is incorrect. While the HSM may temporarily handle public keys during cryptographic operations (e.g., for certificate validation), its primary and secure storage function is limited to private keys. Storing both types of keys is not a standard practice in SWIFT's HSM usage, as public keys are managed outside the HSM in certificate repositories or directories.
Summary of Correct answer:
The HSM box stores private keys (A), ensuring the security of cryptographic operations in the SWIFT environment.
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*SWIFT Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024: Control 1.3 mandates HSMs for storing private keys securely.
*SWIFT Security Guidelines: Details the HSM's role in managing private keys for PKI operations.
*SWIFT HSM Documentation: Confirms that private keys are stored in the HSM, with public keys managed externally.
========
75. Frage
A Treasury Management System (TMS) application is installed on the same machine as the customer connector (such as MQ server) connecting towards a Service Bureau Are these applications/systems in scope of CSCF?
Antwort: C
Begründung:
This question determines the scope of the CSCF for a Treasury Management System (TMS) and an MQ server (customer connector) installed on the same machine.
Step 1: Understand CSCF Scope
TheCSCF v2024defines its scope as systems directly involved in Swift messaging, connectivity, or security (e.
g., customer connectors, messaging interfaces), as perControl 1.1: Swift Environment Protection. Back- office systems, like TMS, are typically out of scope unless they directly process Swift messages.
Step 2: Analyze the Scenario
* TMS Application: A Treasury Management System is a back-office application for financial management, not a Swift messaging component. TheCSCF v2024excludes back-office systems from mandatory scope unless they pose a direct risk to Swift components.
* MQ Server (Customer Connector): This middleware server connects to a Service Bureau, facilitating Swift traffic, making it in scope perControl 1.1.
* Hosting System: The machine hosting both applications is in scope only to the extent it supports the MQ server, not the TMS.
Step 3: Evaluate Each Option
* A. The TMS application, the MQ server and hosting system are in the scope of the CSCF and must be placed in a secure zoneIncorrect. The TMS is out of scope, and the hosting system's inclusion depends on the MQ server, not the TMS.Conclusion: Incorrect.
* B. The TMS application, the MQ server and hosting system enters the scope of the CSCF advisory and should be placed in a secure zoneIncorrect. The CSCF advisory scope applies to best practices, not mandatory controls, and does not mandate a secure zone for out-of-scope TMS.
Conclusion: Incorrect.
* C. Only the MQ server application is in scope of the CSCF. The TMS application is considered as back-officeCorrect. The MQ server is a customer connector, in scope perControl 1.1, while the TMS is a back-office system, excluded from mandatory scope per theCSCF v2024Introduction.Conclusion:
Correct.
* D. The TMS application is the highest risk and must be secured appropriately. The MQ server should be secured on a best effort basisIncorrect. The MQ server, as a Swift component, has higher CSCF priority, while TMS risk is managed outside CSCF scope.Conclusion: Incorrect.
Step 4: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answer isC, as only the MQ server is in scope, and the TMS is a back-office system excluded from CSCF requirements.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Control 1.1: Swift Environment Protection, Introduction Section: Scope.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Back-Office Systems.
76. Frage
What are the conditions required to permit reliance on the compliance conclusion of a control assessed in the previous year? (Choose all that apply.)
Antwort: A,B,C
Begründung:
This question outlines conditions for relying on a previous year's control assessment under theCSCF v2024.
Step 1: Understand Reliance on Previous Assessments
TheIndependent Assessment Frameworkallows reliance on prior assessments to reduce redundancy, provided specific conditions are met, as detailed in theCSCF v2024andSwift CSP Compliance Guidelines.
Step 2: Evaluate Each Option
* A. The control compliance conclusion must have already been relied on the past two yearsThere is no requirement in theCSCF v2024orIndependent Assessment Frameworkthat reliance must have occurred for two prior years. Reliance is assessed annually based on current conditions.Conclusion:
Incorrect.
* B. The previous assessment was performed on the (correct) CSCF version of the previous yearThe assessment must align with the CSCF version active at the time, ensuring relevance. This is a condition in theIndependent Assessment Framework.Conclusion: Correct.
* C. The control definition has not changedIf the control definition in theCSCF v2024has not been updated, prior conclusions remain valid, per theSwift CSP FAQ.Conclusion: Correct.
* D. The control-design and implementation are the sameContinuity in design and implementation is required to ensure the control's effectiveness has not changed, as specified in theIndependent Assessment Framework.Conclusion: Correct.
Step 3: Conclusion and Verification
The correct answers areB, C, and D, as these conditions ensure the prior assessment's relevance and accuracy under theCSCF v2024.
References
* Swift Customer Security Controls Framework (CSCF) v2024, Section: Assessment Reliance.
* Swift Independent Assessment Framework, Section: Reliance Conditions.
* Swift CSP FAQ, Section: Assessment Continuity.
77. Frage
Is it mandated to perform security awareness and other specific trainings every year for individuals with SWIFT-critical roles? (Select the correct answer)
*Swift Customer Security Controls Policy
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025
*Independent Assessment Framework
*Independent Assessment Process for Assessors Guidelines
*Independent Assessment Framework - High-Level Test Plan Guidelines
*Outsourcing Agents - Security Requirements Baseline v2025
*CSP Architecture Type - Decision tree
*CSP_controls_matrix_and_high_test_plan_2025
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls
*Assessment template for Advisory controls
Antwort: A
Begründung:
CSCF Control "6.1 Security Awareness" mandates training for individuals with SWIFT-critical roles (e.g., LSO, RSO, operators) to ensure they understand security policies and procedures. Let's evaluate each option:
*Option A: Yes, and a track record must show that both awareness and specific training are performed annually This is correct. Control 6.1 requires annual security awareness training for all SWIFT-critical personnel, with additional specific training as needed to maintain knowledge. The "Swift Customer SecurityControls Framework v2025" and "Assessment template for Mandatory controls" mandate annual training and require a track record (e.g., logs or certificates) to demonstrate compliance.
*Option B: No, both awareness and specific trainings are planned when deemed required This is incorrect. The CSCF mandates annual awareness training, not just ad-hoc planning, to ensure consistent security awareness.
*Option C: No, awareness training expected to be performed yearly; specific training to maintain the required knowledge only when needed This is incorrect. While specific training can be as needed, awareness training is explicitly required annually, making this option partially inaccurate.
*Option D: No, a track record must show that both awareness and specific training are performed at least bi- yearly (every 2 years) This is incorrect. The CSCF requires annual awareness training, not bi-yearly, as specified in the guidelines.
Summary of Correct answer:
It is mandated to perform security awareness and specific trainings every year, with a track record (A).
References to SWIFT Customer Security Programme Documents:
*Swift Customer Security Controls Framework v2025: Control 6.1 mandates annual training.
*Assessment template for Mandatory controls: Requires annual training records.
*Independent Assessment Framework: Verifies training frequency.
========
78. Frage
Is it necessary to formally explain to the Swift user the testing methodology that will be used for the CSP assessment during the kick-off?
Antwort: B
79. Frage
......
Nun gibt es viele IT-Profis in der ganzen Welt und die Konkurrenz der IT-Branche ist sehr hart. So viele IT-Profis entscheiden sich dafür, an der IT-Zertifizierungsprüfung teilzunehmen, um ihre Position in der IT-Branche zu verstärken. Die CSP-Assessor Prüfung ist eine sehr wichtige Swift-Zertifizierungsprüfung. Aber wenn Sie eine Swift-Zertifizierung erhalten wollen, müssen Sie die Prüfung bestehen.
CSP-Assessor Testing Engine: https://www.deutschpruefung.com/CSP-Assessor-deutsch-pruefungsfragen.html
Our objective is to create a situation where students will find Physics interesting & the strongest subject helping them to achieve top ranks in competitive exams.
SCO 156, Level 2, Sector 37 C, Chandigarh
SCO 34, Level 2, Sector 20 C, Chandigarh
(+91) 987-266-2552, (0172) 466-2552
Copyright © 2021 KP Institute of Physics | Powered by RiAcube
Call 9872662552
